Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

U2´s Upcoming Tour: Three Fan-Friendly Scenarios


  • Please log in to reply
13 replies to this topic

#1 febottini

febottini

    Playboy Mansion ✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪

  • 1,238 posts
  • LocationSão Paulo - Brazil

Posted 24 July 2013 - 11:54 PM

The U2 fan community went into a mini-frenzy today due to a story on an Italian fan site claiming to have inside info on the tour. According to Google Translate, the story states, "One of our inside sources inside the band's management informs us that the organization phase of the new tour is at full capacity. . . The Irish band seems to have no intention of touching fewer cities but to do more concerts in the same location, for example every city three concerts instead of touching different cities and make a full concert. . . each concert with a different setlist."

We'd usually never run a rumor as poorly sourced as that one. Translation issues aside, it seems unlikely that a management source is blabbing about this. Also, the European media doesn't have the best track record when it comes to accuracy. In fact, very little is known about their tour plans. Bono has been pretty clear about the fact that they don't want another stadium run like the massive 360 Tour that ran from 2009 and 2011 and shattered attendance records wherever it went. It's a safe bet they're going back to arenas, much like they did in 2001 after the enormous PopMart stadium tour of 1997/98. (On that note, little is also known about U2's upcoming album, other than Danger Mouse is the producer and it's coming out sometime in the not-too-distant future.)

All that said, the phrase "each concert with a different setlist" did grab our attention. U2 do change around their setlist a bit as their tours go on, but not nearly enough to please the hardcore fans. The vast, vast majority of their catalog remains unplayed throughout the course of their tours.

So let's pretend that this rumor is true. Here are some ways they could structure the shows to make the fans go absolutely insane.

 

Scenario 1 - Complete Album Shows
Night One:  War + the new album
Night Two: The Joshua Tree + the new album
Night Three: Achtung Baby + the new album

Pros: It seems like the obvious move, since so many bands have had great success with this in recent years. Hardcores will go every night and they will finally get to hear super-deep cuts like "Drowning Man,"  "Red Hill Mining Town," "The Refugee" and "Acrobat" live. They could even swap around the albums as the tour goes on, forcing fans to fly all over the world for the chance to hear Zooropa or Octoberlive. 

Cons: It's hard to imagine U2 will want to do something so nakedly nostalgic. Also, it can be a bit lame when you go into a concert and you know exactly what songs they're gonna play and in what order. It takes out much of the fun.  

 

Scenario 2 - Decades Nights
Night One: The 1980s + selections from the new album
Night Two: The 1990s + selections from the new album
Night Three: The 2000s + selections from the new album

Pros: This is still an unabashed nostalgia-fest, but it opens them up to a broader range of material. On night one, they could play hits hits like "Where The Streets Have No Name" and super-obscurities like "I Threw a Brick Through a Window." It'll please the superfans, but not leave the casual ones bored.  

Cons: To be frank, night three will be a bit of a letdown. There's plenty of great songs from the 2000s, but it's their weakest decade. 

 

Scenario 3 - Theme Nights
Night One: Hits + selections from the new album
Night Two: Rarities + selections from the new album
Night Three: Band's choice 

Pros: If they do this, they won't be tied to a single time period each night. The casual fans can all attend night one, and the hardcores can come to night two and have the chance to hear 1980s rarities like "Surrender" followed by latter-stuff like "Daddy's Gonna Pay for Your Crashed Car" and "Moment of Surrender." Then night three can be a nice balance of the two nights.

Cons: There really aren't any cons for this one. It seems like everybody wins, except the casual fans that find themselves at rarities night and have to endure "Your Blue Room" followed by "A Different Kind of Blue" and "Pete the Chop." 

 

From: Rolling Stone


7632973530_0c548fe21e.jpg


#2 U2Girl1966

U2Girl1966

    Ultraviolet ✪✪✪✪✪

  • 380 posts
  • LocationChicago

Posted 25 July 2013 - 02:53 AM

I honestly don't care what they choose to do, as long as I get to see as many shows as I can afford. :)

 

I might be in the minority here, but just let me see them play and I'll call it good.


I can't believe the news today

http://ancatdubh.org


#3 Malahide

Malahide

    Atomic Bomb ✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪

  • 3,592 posts
  • LocationBelgium

Posted 25 July 2013 - 08:43 AM

I Threw A Brick Through A Window a super-obscurity? Surrender a rarity? Rolling Stone doesn't seem in touch with U2.



#4 danielsentana

danielsentana

    Atomic Bomb ✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪

  • 2,577 posts
  • LocationPhiladelphia, PA - originally from Madrid, Spain!!!

Posted 25 July 2013 - 02:56 PM

Well you can't blame them Malahide, few are as obsessed with U2 as us zootops hahaha

 

Personally, i'm fine with keeping up to 60% fixed every leg, NOT tour. those are the songs they need to promote plus the usual classics. but if they put 5,6 different songs every night (not necessarily obscurities like Pete the Chop) then it'd be an amazing tour


NEW YORK, LONDON, PHILLY, MADRID Posted Image EVERYBODY TALK ABOUT POP MUZIK

#5 mich40

mich40

    Lemon ✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪

  • 9,322 posts
  • LocationOff in LaLa Land

Posted 25 July 2013 - 08:17 PM

Scenario 1, night 1, War album...... where do I sign up to be a backup singer for "Red Light" ? :P


Larry_sig_2.jpg


#6 Shannon387

Shannon387

    Atomic Bomb ✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪

  • 3,250 posts
  • LocationStaring at the sun

Posted 26 July 2013 - 02:03 AM

I don't know, this doesn't sound like them at all to be honest. Also, 3 shows in each location + more cities? That sounds like a lot more work than stadiums given how they like to give their audience 100%. It doesn't seem physically possible, but what do I know. Selfishly, I would love to see them do 3 shows where I live. I'd be at every show too! 

 

I guess you could put me in the please release a new album and go on tour and play what ever makes you happy group. They're happy (happy to be there, happy to be playing) = I'm ecstatic. 



#7 mich40

mich40

    Lemon ✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪

  • 9,322 posts
  • LocationOff in LaLa Land

Posted 26 July 2013 - 01:56 PM

Totally agree, Shannon.  The good thing is that the rumour mill is finally running and that's pretty exciting because we are getting closer!!


Larry_sig_2.jpg


#8 Shannon387

Shannon387

    Atomic Bomb ✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪

  • 3,250 posts
  • LocationStaring at the sun

Posted 26 July 2013 - 03:18 PM

Definitely... I'm getting a kick out of the rumors though. Lol

#9 U2Girl1966

U2Girl1966

    Ultraviolet ✪✪✪✪✪

  • 380 posts
  • LocationChicago

Posted 29 July 2013 - 11:21 AM

The rumors are fun to read and dream about. :)

 

Personally I think they'll go back to areanas this tour. And I hopehopehope they play New Orleans (haven't since Pop Mart) cuz that's a free trip home for me. :)


I can't believe the news today

http://ancatdubh.org


#10 moanya

moanya

    Playboy Mansion ✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪

  • 1,317 posts
  • LocationItaly

Posted 29 July 2013 - 04:52 PM

If I should male a choice I would say Scenario 2, night 1. As I discovered U2 in the Rattle and Hum period, I would love to hear songs of the 80', must of all from Boy, October and War.

It will be a great tour btw, as ever. If Bono, Edge, Larry and Adam are on stage it doesn't matter what they play... It will be great

Everything you know is wrong


#11 edbe72

edbe72

    Numb ✪

  • 13 posts
  • LocationKerkrade (Netherlands)

Posted 30 July 2013 - 10:20 AM

I hope it's just like the joshua tree tour every night a different setlist.



#12 danielsentana

danielsentana

    Atomic Bomb ✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪✪

  • 2,577 posts
  • LocationPhiladelphia, PA - originally from Madrid, Spain!!!

Posted 30 July 2013 - 02:27 PM

I hope it's just like the joshua tree tour every night a different setlist.

Realistically, even if they go close to the Elevation tour where they swapped a couple songs every once in a while would be OK


NEW YORK, LONDON, PHILLY, MADRID Posted Image EVERYBODY TALK ABOUT POP MUZIK

#13 edbe72

edbe72

    Numb ✪

  • 13 posts
  • LocationKerkrade (Netherlands)

Posted 30 July 2013 - 02:34 PM

I hope it's just like the joshua tree tour every night a different setlist.

Realistically, even if they go close to the Elevation tour where they swapped a couple songs every once in a while would be OK

we will see, i hope they will going to small places...

#14 richie459

richie459

    Ultraviolet ✪✪✪✪✪

  • 248 posts
  • LocationYorkshire, England

Posted 30 July 2013 - 06:06 PM

I'm happy with the hits but if they shake up at least 4-5 songs every night that would be good!

 

Its a tough call...I would love to go and hear all the rarities but this will be the first time Im taking my girlfriend and wouldn't want her to go and not hear all the hits she wants too.