u2blonde Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Izzy2u wrote: but they say that huge pics are disrupting the harmony of the forum and makes it hard for some people to navigate so they put this rule in. who are they to decide what the harmony of the forum should be? It's a fansite! Let's the fans decide what harmony is. Fuckin' unbelievable...hasn't anyone told them that the stupid website is hard to navigate and has harmony of a dysfunctional family because of theway they built it? Not to mention the way they run it? Feels wrong. uuuuugh. STUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUPIIIIIIIIIIIIIID Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Lapa Posted March 3, 2009 Subscriber Share Posted March 3, 2009 http://i680.photobucket.com/albums/vv161/NLOTH/Vinter2009-NoLineontheHorizon.jpg] Picture exceeds maximum size please go here for guidelines I don't know if the size of this pic is within the new size limitations but I thought I would upload it anyway! My own No Line on the Horizon photo! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
u2blonde Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 it's an awesome pic, Lapa:D hope the stazi/securitatea/UDBA folks running this excuse of a fansite don't take it down lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Lapa Posted March 3, 2009 Subscriber Share Posted March 3, 2009 u2blonde wrote: it's an awesome pic, Lapa:D hope the stazi/securitatea/UDBA folks running this excuse of a fansite don't take it down lol Thanks U2B! I more and more feel like they rushed too much when they changed the layout of the Zoo. If they had given it a little more time perhaps they could avoided allthe problems the site is suffering from now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MullenArianne Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Lovely photo Lapa, I'm gonna right-click-save it if you don't mind [with your name of course]. What I think they should've done is testing it out beforehand on some test users who would've reported back the glitches that we now have to bear with.I can't possibly believe they did that and we still ended up with this mess. LOL! I can't imagine how much does it take building a site but they hadquite a lot of time me thinks... at least half a year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber Lapa Posted March 3, 2009 Subscriber Share Posted March 3, 2009 Thanks MA! Of course you can right-click-save the photo if you like!:-) You're absolutely right about the testing and it doesn't really look like they have tested the site before they launched it. A funny fact here is thatthe project I'm working on right now is about service design and we've done lots of new service testing on different focus groups. So U2.com could havehired me to help them design the site! The name of the project is btw. Desire so it's quite U2 related! LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liz Posted March 3, 2009 Share Posted March 3, 2009 Good morning peeps.....well, I finally made it onto the free side.......how's everything going? Is everyone groovy and swinging their mojos? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izzy2u Posted March 3, 2009 Author Share Posted March 3, 2009 g'morning nice pix lapa no it doesn't take 6 months but maybe a month of working 10 hours a day on it. But then you get hire someone with knowledgeof the program used and it makes it a lot easier. Then restricting thing before you know what their cause and effect are seems irrational too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Subscriber pollyanna Posted March 3, 2009 Subscriber Share Posted March 3, 2009 I'm boss free...but working...just so you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izzy2u Posted March 3, 2009 Author Share Posted March 3, 2009 our boys are working so hard! Careful don't break a nail Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts